So the all-new Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 is close to its launch and the upcoming Bajaj Pulsar model will soon become the first-ever 160cc motorcycle to go on sale under the Pulsar moniker. Also, from the looks of it, the NS 160 is target squarely the TVS Apache RTR 160. The Apache offers a grunty motor, decent road handling and sharp looks. In comparison, the NS 160, which shares in plenty with the NS 200, offers the streetnaked looks of its elder sibling along with a decent balance between handling and ride quality. We are yet to ride the NS 160 but from the looks of it, the RTR 160 could soon get some sleepless nights. Here’s our Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 comparison to check out how these two compare with each other. 
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 Price Comparison
| Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 | TVS Apacha RTR 160 |
| ₹ 80,000 | ₹ 79,304 |
The NS 160 should have a sticker price of roughly ₹ 80,000. In comparison, the Apache RTR 160 costs ₹ 79,304 (ex-showroom, New Delhi). Yes, it doesn’t look like there will be a considerable price difference between these two, but let’s not forget that the new 160cc Pulsar is a fresher model.
Also See – Pulsar NS 180 | Pulsar AS150
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 Specifications Comparison
| Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 | TVS Apache RTR 160 | |
| Engine | 160.3 cc | 159.7 cc |
| Max. Power | 15.5 PS | 15.4 PS |
| Peak Torque | 14.6 Nm | 13.1 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual | 5-Speed Manual |
The Pulsar NS 160 offers more power and torque than the Apache RTR 160. That said, let’s not forget that the Apache RTR 160 is a fairly lighter machine and hence, there are chances of a slim difference in the real world performance of these two motorcycles. Both the bikes here get a 5-speed Manual Transmission.
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 Mileage Comparison
| Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 | TVS Apache RTR 160 | |
| Mileage | 55 KMPL | 55 KMPL |
There are chances that both the bikes here will offer similar mileage figures. We really don’t expect a great difference in the fuel efficiency of these two offerings.
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 Top Speed Comparison
| Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 | TVS Apache RTR 160 | |
| Top Speed | 120 KMPH | 118 KMPH |
In all likelihood, the Pulsar NS 160cc model will be slightly faster than the Apache RTR 160. While both these bikes will have a much higher speedo-indicted top speed, the real top speed, however, will be somewhere aroudn 120 KMPH.
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 0-100 KMPH Comparison
| Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 | TVS Apache RTR 160 | |
| 0-100 KMPH | 12.5 seconds | 12.07 seconds |
Thanks to fantastic gearing and a lower kerb weight, the RTR 160 could be slightly quicker to 100 KMPH.
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 Dimensions Comparison
| Pulsar NS 160 | Apache RTR 160 | |
| Overall Length | 2012 mm | 2085 mm |
| Overall Width | 803.5 mm | 730 mm |
| Overall Height | 1060 mm | 1105 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1363 mm | 1326 mm |
| Weight (Kerb) | 142 KGs | 137 KGs |
| Max. Fuel Tank Capacity | 12-litres | 16-litres |
| Tyre Size (Front) | 80/100-17 | 90/90-17 |
| Tyre Size (Rear) 100/90-17 | 100/90-17 | 110/80-17 |
Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 Design Comparison
Both these motorcycles are really different in the way they look. While the NS 160 boasts a streetnaked design, the RTR 160 has a bikini fairing and sleek panels. Both the bikes looks really good; while the NS 160 looks butch and handsome, the RTR 160 looks sleeker and athletic. It’s a matter of personal choices, really. Both the models offer a semi-digital speedo console with an analogue tacho and a digital speedo display. Also, both the motorcycles offer high quality plastics and decent build quality. Even in terms of features, these two bikes are well matched.
Stay tuned to Car Blog India for more posts like the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 comparison we have here.
The post Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 appeared first on CarBlogIndia.
from CarBlogIndia http://bit.ly/2t8b0iQ
Comments
Post a Comment